In terms of features, users of Hyper-V weren’t satisfied with the recovery capabilities and the instability if the stack became bloated. Most users of Proxmox VE were happy with the support, though there were a few who thought it needed improvement.Ĭomparison Results: Based on the parameters we compared, Hyper-V and Proxmox VE seem to have a more or less rating among users regarding ease of deployment, pricing, and service and support. Half of them found the support to be excellent, while the others felt there was room for improvement. Service and Support: Users of Hyper-V had mixed reviews when it came to technical support.Users of Proxmox VE found it very affordable. Pricing: Reviewers of Hyper-V felt the pricing was great, especially for customers working with budget restraints.
They also felt that moving things to the cloud was difficult and, because it's a young solution, there are some bugs. However, users didn’t like that certain processes weren’t automatic, like manually updating. Users of Proxmox VE liked that the software is easy to use, has a simple setup and good performance, and has a good backup service.
However, users also lament the need for better cloud integration, disastrous recovery capabilities, and instability if the load is too high. Features: Users of Hyper-V reported the best features to be its stability, ease of use, user-friendliness, and the ability to do checkpoints and roll back to the checkpoint.Ease of Deployment: For the most part, users of both Hyper-V and Proxmox VE felt that deployment was relatively easy and didn’t take long at all to set up and deploy.After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below. We performed a comparison between Hyper-V and Proxmox VE based on our users’ reviews in four categories.
0 kommentar(er)
